The volume of Asian institutional assets accessible to external managers is expected to rise by $700 billion by 2016 according to Boston-based Cerulli Associates. However managers face greater hurdles securing mandates and a profitability squeeze from the Asian institutional client segment. Zero management fees are increasingly appearing in the markets of China, South Korea and Thailand rather than the typical 2% management fee and 20% performance fee structure due to increasing competition over mandates. AFM's view has always been that if performance is good enough fees should not be a deterrent to investment, rather if performance has been insufficient investors should redeem and reinvest with better performing managers.

The growth in Asian institutional assets is set to be mirrored in Australia with Superannuation funds to reach $3.5 trillion by 2025 and possibly $7-8 trillion by 2035 according to The Hon. Nick Sherry (former Assistant Treasurer now a consultant at Ernst & Young). The growth in Superannuation assets is likely to result in increasing offshore investment as local investment opportunities are insufficient to handle the increasing Superannuation pool.

Read the entire article here. by Rita Raagas De Ramos, Financial Times.

We have noticed a focus in recent weeks on the expansion of the SMSF sector, with comments regarding the risks and potential lack of controls in the sector, and concerns from the major super funds that with over one third of all superannuation now in the hands of SMSF Trustees the industry was seeing fee opportunities slip out the door.

With that of course have been a range of strategies from various parties designed either to stem the flow, or get a part of the action.

Industry, corporate and retail super funds should all have concerns, but the Hon Nick Sherry, former Assistant Treasurer, indicated his view was that the expansion of the SMSF sector would start to slow as a proportion of the total $1.54 trillion superannuation pool, even though this total is forecast to grow to $3.5 trillion by 2025, and potentially $7 or $8 trillion by 2035.

It is worth bearing in mind that although the SMSF sector controls 35% of total funds, it is estimated that only 3% of the population are the beneficiaries. Most of the funds with larger balances were probably set up under previous governments, and this supports Sherry's view that while the gross amount will grow, the proportion may not.

Sherry also predicted, as have a number of others, that there will be a significant decline in the number of APRA regulated funds as My Super comes into effect and the focus on the low cost default option drives a focus on size and fees. Meanwhile the SMSF sector will continue to focus on performance and value.

Former PM Paul Keating also weighed into the Super debate this week, calling for the Super Guarantee Levy to be increased from the current 9% to 15%, with 3% of that to be allocated directly to the aging population, while taking a swipe at the SMSF sector and the overly high allocation to equities.

Expect to hear more of probably the same arguments going forward. Australia's much vaunted system for funding the retirement of an ageing population may be the envy of much of the world, but perfect it certainly isn't. Meanwhile everyone in the financial services industry here and abroad are after their slice of it, including Treasurer Swan who'd love to tap it to fund the looming budget deficit.

Meanwhile AFM's Equity Index performance for October stands at 1.53% and 8.72% year to date. The market may have rallied but there are plenty of managers who still remain cautious with some finding returns hard to come by. Over the past 12 months 60% may have outperformed the ASX200, but a further 20% have failed to produce a positive return.

Have a good week-end.

Regards,

Chris.

Of the many Dec. 31 deadlines facing Washington, at least one is getting pushed out, according to regulatory officials: The final draft of the Volcker Rule. 

Industry commentators have tried to outline an approach by which the boutique funds industry can avoid being sidelined by the rise in self-managed super funds (SMSFs) and the independent investor market.

Pengana Capital portfolio manager Steve Black said affected asset managers must come up with innovative structures that allow for the flexibility and tax advantages that can be found in the managed account structures popular among independent investors.

While that would increase administrative costs, fund managers should investigate using technology to lower those costs, he said.

Technology was already improving systems to help fund managers come up with structures that weren't too expensive or onerous for investors, Black said.

At the same time, Bennelong chief executive Jarrod Brown urged fund managers to focus more on increasing their market presence and branding if they hoped to capture the attention of the SMSF and independent investor market. 

To read the entire article, please click here.

Investors poured hundreds of millions of pounds into equity funds last month, making stocks the leading asset class for the second month in a row, according to the UK's Investment Management Association.

The IMA said net retail sales of £550m in October were the highest since April, in contrast with an average outflow of £9m over the past 12 months. It said the shift suggested that the tide was turning in favour of equities.

Some of the world's largest investors have increased their exposure to stocks because of cheap valuations and growing confidence over earnings.

Aberdeen Asset Management, Schroders and Henderson Global Investors are all backing equities as many of their funds increase exposure to stocks.

Martin Gilbert, chief executive of Aberdeen, which enjoyed strong results this week because of its equity inflows, said: "I do not believe equities are dead. We are seeing strong demand for equities."

Didier Duret, chief investment officer of ABN Amro private bank, said: "We went overweight in emerging market equities and European equities in September as we like the valuations and the prospects for strong earnings."

David Coombs, head of research at Rathbones Investment Management, said equities were helped because bonds were expensive. "We have been reducing exposure to bonds and increasing equities. When we talk to clients we say that the risk/reward on corporate bonds does not look very attractive now," he said.

Read the entire article here.

Hedge funds' glory days seem a long way off as they head into a tricky 2013, with bumper profits likely to remain elusive in markets now dominated by political and central bank action.

Speakers at the Reuters Global Investment 2013 Outlook Summit said the $2 trillion industry, which has disappointed investors with below-market returns this year and losses last year, faces a headache making money in an environment where markets are choppy and not as buoyant.

"We're now (in) a world where we recognize that the ability to make money is a lot more difficult and there aren't that many people who can do it. There simply aren't enough, it just doesn't exist," said Saker Nusseibeh, CEO of Hermes Fund Managers.

"Lots of hedge funds are not making even a positive return. They should be doing 4-5 percent. And they're not ... Suppose it's the smartest people with the smartest models, and they've had 10 years' practice. If you give me 10 years I'm sure I can come back and play the piano badly."

Hedge funds made double-digit returns in seven out of nine years between 1991 and 1999, according to Hedge Fund Research's HFRI index, and made returns of more than 9 percent every year between 2003 and 2007 inclusive amid rising markets.

However, their secret sauce of 'alpha' - profits due to a manager's skill rather than overall market moves - has been hard to find in the 'risk-on, risk-off' environment where markets can be more influenced by the words of euro zone politicians and central bankers than companies' fundamentals.

Funds have lost money in two of the four calendar years prior to 2012, according to HFRI. This year the average fund is up just 2.24 percent to November 23, according to the HFRX index, well behind a 12.1 percent gain in the S&P 500 index .SPX.

Some star managers have been able to thrive in this environment, betting on anything from Greek debt to rising stocks to asset-backed securities.

CQS Chief Executive Michael Hintze, one of the industry's most influential managers, has returned 29 percent from his Directional Opportunities fund in the first 10 months of the year and told the summit he sees a "target-rich environment" in 2013 with opportunities shorting bonds using credit default swaps.

However, fund executives say there may be fewer opportunities for the industry - which has ballooned in size over the past 10 years - as a whole to exploit.

"Alpha delivery can be very difficult. If you have risk-on, risk-off it can be more difficult," William De Vijlder, CIO of BNP Paribas Investment Partners, said.

"There are less big valuation discrepancies around," he added. "You think of 2006 or 2007 and then you think of early 2009 and huge valuation gaps. So perhaps now this is a more difficult (environment) ... When you have something that is very much central bank-led it's much more difficult."

However, De Vijlder said long-short funds, which bet on rising and falling prices but which have struggled as their bets often move in the same direction - may profit as correlations between stocks in an index come down.

Meanwhile regulation such as curbs on naked credit default swaps, short-selling bans and greater reporting requirements could all make life tougher for the sector.

Read the rest of the article here.

Two traders from Goldman Sachs's now defunct proprietary trading desk have started up their own fund, Auscap Asset Management, in Sydney.

Tim Carleton, 31, and Matthew Parker, 36, were forced out of the bank in November last year after the Australian business, Goldman Sachs & Partners, was acquired by its US parent.

The change in ownership subjected the Australian operations to US Dodd-Frank regulatory reforms aimed at making banks safer. One of the provisions of the bill, the Volcker Rule, prohibits commercial banks from making proprietary trades with their own capital.

The pair are not allowed to use their performance numbers at Goldman to market the new venture, but sources estimate the proprietary strategies team, of which they were a part, accounted for one-third to one-half of profits at Goldman Sachs & Partners.

Read the entire article here.