Fund Monitors Pty Ltd
© Copyright 2024
Printed: 25 February 2024 7:20 AM


16 Feb 2024 - Murray Ackman: Ignore the billionaires - diversity, equity and inclusion are good for investors

By: Pendal

Murray Ackman: Ignore the billionaires -

diversity, equity and inclusion are good for investors


February 2023

AMERICAN billionaires seem to be picking fights with big brands and civil rights groups over whether corporate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies are discriminatory.

Or even whether they cause aircraft malfunctions.

If you've been following the "woke backlash", you'd be familiar with recent flash points such as the campaign against Harvard's first Black female president Claudine Gay.

Tesla's Elon Musk, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman and Lululemon founder Chip Wilson have all been engaging in civil discourse on social media recently, expressing anti-DEI views.

Musk went as far as suggesting that Boeing, fresh from having a fuselage panel fall off mid-flight last month, was prioritising diversity over safety. That drew a swift rebuke from civil rights groups.

"DEI must DIE," Musk said recently on his X social network. "The point was to end discrimination, not replace it with different discrimination."

This week the Tesla CEO erased mention of DEI in the electric vehicle maker's corporate filings.

Do DEI critics have a point? And what does that mean for investors and companies?

What are the concerns about DEI?

Musk's criticism of Boeing centred around the impact and unintended consequences of connecting executive pay to diversity targets and ESG metrics.

At the start of 2022 Boeing altered its bonus scheme, rewarding executives who hit certain climate and DEI targets.

Boeing is certainly not alone here.

In 2011, just 1 per cent of listed companies had such a policy. By 2021 it was 38 per cent, and the trend continues.

Supporters argue this is positive for companies and shareholders.

The idea is that such policies safeguard future economic results from risks while aligning the managerial objectives with shareholder interests.

Sharemarket analysts look for such policies as a sign that a business cares about a particular issue.

Who's right?

Does linking executive pay to diversity improve a business? Or are such corporate DEI policies a sign of excess?

There are plenty of studies - including from Pereptual's Regnan sustainable investing business - suggesting DEI can drive business outperformance.

A 2021 study from sustainable investing leader Regnan found that DEI - and especially equity and inclusion - can drive business outperformance.

A series of McKinsey & Company reports found "not only that the [DEI] business case remains robust but also that the relationship between diversity on executive teams and the likelihood of financial outperformance has strengthened over time".

Yet Regnan also found many businesses think about diversity and inclusion in a flawed way. For example, DEI policies often focus on the needs of minority groups, while majorities are not always adequately considered.

For investors and companies alike, we believe organisational settings should allow all talent to flourish - including 'majority talent' as well as talent that is traditionally under-represented.

These are essential pre-requisites for an equitable and inclusive workplace. Businesses benefit from fair employment practices, supportive cultures and open decision-making.

What it means for investors

While there is now a lot of ESG measurement going on inside companies, it's fair to say there could be a deeper discussion about how inclusive culture can be good for a business.

But is Elon Musk right to say there is undue focus placed on DEI?

The billionaire's complaints could make sense in the context of a boot-strapped start-up operating from the proverbial garage.

But it feels provocative coming from the CEO of a business with one of the highest market caps in history.

Based on our experience at Pendal, businesses clearly demonstrate what they care about by what they report.

And that is useful for investors.

Investors should expect to see comprehensive DE&I plans from companies. And take caution with companies that ignore these responsibilities.

And they should look beyond the reported diversity numbers to understand if a business has the right structure to allow for diversity and growth.

While it's entertaining to see billionaires argue among themselves, investors must understand how a company thinks about diversity and inclusion if they want to understand whether it is managing risks.

Author: Murray Ackman

Funds operated by this manager:

Pendal Focus Australian Share FundPendal Global Select Fund - Class RPendal Horizon Sustainable Australian Share FundPendal MicroCap Opportunities FundPendal Sustainable Australian Fixed Interest Fund - Class RRegnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund - Class RRegnan Credit Impact Trust Fund

This information has been prepared by Pendal Fund Services Limited (PFSL) ABN 13 161 249 332, AFSL No 431426 and is current as at December 8, 2021. PFSL is the responsible entity and issuer of units in the Pendal Multi-Asset Target Return Fund (Fund) ARSN: 623 987 968. A product disclosure statement (PDS) is available for the Fund and can be obtained by calling 1300 346 821 or visiting The Target Market Determination (TMD) for the Fund is available at You should obtain and consider the PDS and the TMD before deciding whether to acquire, continue to hold or dispose of units in the Fund. An investment in the Fund or any of the funds referred to in this web page is subject to investment risk, including possible delays in repayment of withdrawal proceeds and loss of income and principal invested. This information is for general purposes only, should not be considered as a comprehensive statement on any matter and should not be relied upon as such. It has been prepared without taking into account any recipient's personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this, recipients should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness having regard to their individual objectives, financial situation and needs. This information is not to be regarded as a securities recommendation. The information may contain material provided by third parties, is given in good faith and has been derived from sources believed to be accurate as at its issue date. While such material is published with necessary permission, and while all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information is complete and correct, to the maximum extent permitted by law neither PFSL nor any company in the Pendal group accepts any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of this information. Performance figures are calculated in accordance with the Financial Services Council (FSC) standards. Performance data (post-fee) assumes reinvestment of distributions and is calculated using exit prices, net of management costs. Performance data (pre-fee) is calculated by adding back management costs to the post-fee performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any projections are predictive only and should not be relied upon when making an investment decision or recommendation. Whilst we have used every effort to ensure that the assumptions on which the projections are based are reasonable, the projections may be based on incorrect assumptions or may not take into account known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The actual results may differ materially from these projections. For more information, please call Customer Relations on 1300 346 821 8am to 6pm (Sydney time) or visit our website

Australian Fund Monitors Pty Ltd
A.C.N. 122 226 724
AFSL 324476
Email: [email protected]