Drawdowns and small stocks for God-like performance
"If God is omnipotent, could he create a long-term active investment strategy fund that was so good that he could never get fired?," US-based quantitative investor and author Wesley Gray asked several years ago.
Gray's data indicated that God would likely get fired - if God focused on picking investments that would deliver top decile (top 10%) returns over five years. After picking the stocks with perfect foresight and heading out fishing for five years, Gray found God's celestial clients would have endured drawdowns of as much as 76% in the interim. How many clients would have had the stomach to endure that?
We semi-regularly take a look back at what the return distribution for ASX industrials has been like over a five year period. It is an exercise that provides data points and context when considering risk and return.
We ran the numbers for the five years through to the end of August 2021, and found that:
Source: Equitable Investors, Sentieo
Some of the names in the top decile are well known "growth" stocks like Hub24 (ASX: HUB) and Pro Medicus (ASX: PME).
But there are plenty of names you may not have heard of - like IT recruitment and labour player HiTech Group (ASX: HIT) and medical diagnostic developer Proteomics (ASX: PIQ).
For context, the annualised total returns for both the S&P/ASX 100 and the S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries benchmarks were both around 11% - substantially higher than the median stock in this review.
The median stock would underperform indices over five years, if not for any other reason than simply because those indices would be rebalanced through the period in favour of the stocks that are performing.
The distribution of returns in this period of review was similar to when we ran the same analysis back in May 2018, although in the latest numbers there is a slightly larger portion of stocks that have had negative outcomes (40% now versus 36% then).
These figures are also consistent with a US analysis of the total lifetime returns for individual stocks between 1993 and 2006, where Blackstar Funds found 39% of all stocks had a negative return and around 20% were "significant" winners returning 300% or more.
Source: Blackstar Funds
Key insights we take out of the data presented here are that:
Author: Martin Pretty
Funds operated by this manager:
Equitable Investors Dragonfly Fund
Nothing in this blog constitutes investment advice - or advice in any other field. Neither the information, commentary or any opinion contained in this blog constitutes a solicitation or offer by Equitable Investors Pty Ltd (Equitable Investors) or its affiliates to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. Nor shall any such security be offered or sold to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase, or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction.
The content of this blog should not be relied upon in making investment decisions. Any decisions based on information contained on this blog are the sole responsibility of the visitor. In exchange for using this blog, the visitor agree to indemnify Equitable Investors and hold Equitable Investors, its officers, directors, employees, affiliates, agents, licensors and suppliers harmless against any and all claims, losses, liability, costs and expenses (including but not limited to legal fees) arising from your use of this blog, from your violation of these Terms or from any decisions that the visitor makes based on such information.
This blog is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice. The information on this blog does not constitute a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. Although this material is based upon information that Equitable Investors considers reliable and endeavours to keep current, Equitable Investors does not assure that this material is accurate, current or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any opinions expressed on this blog may change as subsequent conditions vary.
Equitable Investors does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained on this blog and does not warrant that the functions contained in this blog will be uninterrupted or error-free, that defects will be corrected, or that the blog will be free of viruses or other harmful components. Equitable Investors expressly disclaims all liability for errors and omissions in the materials on this blog and for the use or interpretation by others of information contained on the blog